Example of a
| |||||||||
Condominium
Value | |
Value: Cost: Gain: |
$1,000,000 $200,000 $800,000 |
At 70 years old they wish to avoid working with tenants and repairs to the condo. The Smiths have considered selling, but they have been slowed down by circumstances: Whom would they consider as the real estate agent? What about the necessary cleanup? What if they do not want to pay capital gain tax (15 percent) or the recapture of depreciation tax (25 percent)?
Mary recently spoke with a friend who not long ago had been in a similar situation. She suggested talking with an attorney about donating the property since she knew the Smiths were very involved with several non-profit organizations. After meeting with a development officer, the Smiths sat with an attorney who suggested a Charitable Remainder Trust.
In their tax bracket, they could place the property in a charitable remainder trust that would sell the property and invest the proceeds in other investments without having to pay capital gain tax. The Smiths would receive an income for life based on a percentage of the assets in the trust. The trust would be revalued every year, and if the assets increase, their income would rise as well. After their lives, the remainder in the trust would go to the nonprofit organization of their choice.
The attorney ran some numbers and suggested that the Smiths take a 5 percent payout from the trust ($50,000 the first year as opposed to the $40,000 they are currently earning). The attorney estimated that the trust could earn 7 percent and would continue to pay the Smiths 5 percent each year of the value of the assets in the trust*.
Unitrust | |
First
Year Income: Total Estim. Income: Tax Savings: |
$50,000 $1,214,870 $148,102 |
At their deaths, the remainder in the trust would pass without taxes or probate to the nonprofit organization they choose. Based on assumptions and his calculations, the nonprofit organization would receive $1,485,950 in about 20 years. It would increase from the initial $1,000,000 because it was earning more than it was paying to the Smiths.
Furthermore, the Smiths would be able to take a current year charitable tax deduction (depending on their taxable income) of $423,150 with a tax saving in their 35% tax bracket of $148,102 (not including any state tax savings) and they would defer $120,000 in capital gains tax over a number of years. In addition, they could look forward (again, based on assumptions and current rates) to a total income of $1,214,870** over their estimated lifetime.
Knowing that the trust would mean a wonderful thing for their nonprofit organization and that they would have higher income and fewer worries without the property itself, the Smiths decided to follow the attorney's suggestion.
A graphic illustration of a charitable remainder trust is available.
Example assumes
a 5.0 percent applicable federal rate.
* The assumption is that the 7% earnings are comprised of 3% income and
4% appreciation.
** Assumptions are the trust earns 7 percent with the difference between
the 5 percent payout and the 7 percent earnings reinvested in the trust
each year.
Please note, individual financial circumstances will vary. These calculations are estimates of gift benefits and have been prepared by Planned Giving Manager, a computation program of PGCalc. The information on this site does not constitute legal or tax advice. Donor stories are for purposes of illustration only. As with all tax and estate planning, please consult your attorney or estate specialist. All material is copyrighted and is for viewing purposes only. Use of this site signifies your agreement with the terms of use. The content in this Planned Giving section has been developed by Future Focus. Please report any problems to webmaster. Revised: January 18, 2008 21:57.