

The
following is intended as general information and does not represent legal or tax
advice. Individual circumstances vary - please consult your legal and tax advisors
about your specific situation. As a monthly news source, some information may
remain on this page for several weeks.
There
is a loftier ambition than merely to stand high in the world. It is to stoop down
and lift mankind a little higher. Henry
Van Dyke |
Recent
Economic News
Treasury
Secretary Expects Strong Economic Growth (AP) - Treasury Secretary John Snow
said Sunday he expects continued strong economic growth and "lots and lots of
good jobs" created in the coming months.
At the same time, however, he said
world affairs have so dominated the public's attention that the strong growth
is not reflected in polls about President Bush's stewardship of the economy.
"There's
been so much attention to other things, particularly the war in Iraq, that it's
deflected attention from the economy," Snow said. "But the news on the economy
... is so good and so pervasive, so far-reaching, that I think people will change
their views here."
The nine-month period that ended April 30 showed an annual
growth of 5.5% in the gross domestic product, which measures the value of all
goods and services produced in the United States. That was the strongest three-quarter
growth in 20 years, Snow said on CNN's Late Edition.
"I think we're going
to see more of the same continuing strong GDP growth and continuing strong job
growth," Snow said.
USA Today 6/20/2004
Jobs
Creation Act (6/17/04) On June 17, 2004, the House passed by a vote of 251-178
the American Jobs Creation Act (H.R. 4520). The Act has four major sections and
benefits.
First, it will end the sanctions by the European Union on American
products. The EU is steadily increasing tariffs on American products, since it
had determined that the existing U. S. tax law with respect to exports was illegal
under World Trade Organization rules.
Second, it reduces the corporate tax
rate from 35% to 32% for both domestic manufacturers and small businesses.
Third,
it reduces double taxation of U. S. corporations with foreign entities.
Fourth,
it is designed to facilitate job growth for U. S. companies.
The House and
Senate JOBS bills will now proceed to a conference committee.
GiftLaw
6/18/04
Related
story - The House Ways and Means Committee late June 16 released the committee
report to accompany H.R. 4520, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, that would
revise tax laws to make U.S. manufacturing businesses more competitive. With respect
to charitable giving, the bill extends the enhanced charitable deduction for gifts
of computer technology and equipment; modifies the rules for donations of patents
and other intellectual property; requires increased reporting for noncash gifts;
requires qualified appraisals for vehicle donations; and includes a charitable
deduction for certain expenses in support of native Alaskan subsistence whaling.
PGDC
6/20/04
Greenspan
Re-Nominated (5/19/04) - President Bush nominated Alan Greenspan to a fifth
term as chairman of the Federal Reserve on Tuesday, making short work of speculation
that the White House was holding up the renomination in hopes of persuading the
Fed to keep interest rates low during the presidential campaign. Bush said in
a statement that he had "great confidence" in the 78-year-old central banker,
who had done a "superb job." Greenspan replied in kind, saying he was honored
and would be happy to continue in office. The renomination attracted bipartisan
political support. The president's likely Democratic rival, John Kerry, said Greenspan's
"overall record as chairman … has been one of distinction." The reaction was a
tad cooler among some close to the Fed. "It's about time," declared Allan Meltzer,
a Carnegie Mellon University economist who is writing a multivolume history of
the central bank. Meltzer said he didn't know whether the White House had intended
to pressure the Fed, but suggested the renomination was coming awfully late. Greenspan's
term as chairman runs out June 20.
From NYTimes G. Gosselin,
Times Staff Writer
Senate
Passes JOBS Act with Car Donation Amendments, No CARE Act (May 13, 2004) -
On Tuesday, May 11, the Senate passed S. 1637, the Jumpstart Our Business Strength
(JOBS) Act, which includes provisions to crackdown on individuals who take over-inflated
deductions for charitable gifts of vehicles.
The Charity Aid, Recovery and
Empowerment (CARE) Act had been offered by Sens. Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Joseph
Lieberman (D-CT) as an amendment to the bill, but was never considered on the
Senate floor.
Included as an amendment to the measure are provisions authored
by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA). Grassley's amendment
changes the rules for valuing and reporting donations of vehicles (including boats
and airplanes). For such gifts, donors would only be able to claim as a donation
the actual sales price received by the charity-not the fair market value permitted
under current law.
A donor of a vehicle must get a written acknowledgement
from the charity indicating for how much it had sold the vehicle. If the charity
did not sell the vehicle, it must provide a receipt for the vehicle within thirty
days. To receive the deduction, the donor must include the acknowledgement or
receipt with his or her tax return.
The House has yet to act on the bill.
However, Rep. William Thomas (R-CA), the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee,
has introduced a proposal that would disallow charitable deductions for donated
vehicles unless the donor had the vehicle appraised.
AFP is concerned about
the impact the Senate provision would have on charitable vehicle donation programs.
The association will be working with other organizations to see a more balanced
and less burdensome car donation provision included in the final legislation.
AFP will also be continuing to seek passage of the CARE Act and will be advocating
for its inclusion in the House version of the JOBS bill.
Source:
www.afpnet.org
PARIS,
May 11 (Reuters) - OECD urges Fed action to cool US economy - Policy makers
should start efforts to cool the U.S. economy sooner rather than later and a hike
in the Federal Reserve's interest rates in June would be a reasonable start, the
Organization for Economic Growth and Development's chief economist said.
The
U.S. central bank would have to shoulder the burden of withdrawing stimulus from
the world's largest economy as there was little prospect of a tightening of fiscal
policy, Jean-Philippe Cotis told Reuters in an interview.
"The
general message we have is basically withdrawals (of stimulus) should be started
sooner rather than later," he said. "For the U.S., the main risk is that macroeconomic
policies remain too expansionary too long during the upswing."
Asked
whether June would be a reasonable time for the Federal Reserve to start raising
interest rates, Cotis said: "Yes, sure." Rate rises should be measured, he said:
"Incremental is the best option, but it could depend obviously on circumstances."
Fed
holds fast on interest rates - for now - 05/05/04 - The Federal Reserve on
Tuesday left short-term interest rates unchanged but signaled a growing readiness
to end its long campaign of cheap money.
The benchmark rate now will remain
- for at least a little longer - at its lowest level since Dwight Eisenhower's
second term as a spur to borrowing, investing and hiring. In a unanimous statement
issued after its meeting Tuesday, the Fed's rate-setting committee cited evidence
of economic growth and a start to hiring. Moreover, it shrugged off recent hints
of inflation - for decades the Fed's main foe - as being "well-contained."
In
previous statements issued with rate decisions, the Fed used the word "patience"
to describe its commitment to low rates. This time, the Fed said it can retreat
at a "measured" pace from rock-bottom interest rates. "They are saying they will
raise rates, but they are being cagey about the timing," said Rajeev Dhawan, director
of the Economic Forecasting Center at Georgia State University. "The timing depends
on when job growth will stick."
Michael E. Kanell The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution
When
To Consider Revising Your Will
Once
you write your will, you can file it away and forget it, right? Wrong. Life situations
change and in many instances it becomes necessary to review and, perhaps, even
update your will. Below, we've listed a few of life's events that might trigger
another look at your last testament (taken from It's Your Money, May 2004):
- A
change in the value of your estate. Even though you might have percentages in
your will, when the value of your estate changes substantially, you might want
to revisit how you expect to bequeath it.
- Changes
in your family structure. Whenever births, deaths, marriages or divorces occur
within your family, consider how those changes might affect the wording in your
will.
- Changes
in your heirs' financial needs. Your will may provide for certain portions of
your estate to be held in trust for a spouse, children or others. Have their needs
changed? Are current provisions inadequate? Too adequate?
-
Changes in your business circumstances. Have you bought, sold, terminated or otherwise
changed one or more of your businesses? The distribution of your interest in the
business may need to be changed as well.
TOP
OF PAGE
| CLOSE WINDOW
Mid-Month
Updates from Last Month
Billion
Dollar Scam Preyed on Seniors (5/07/04)
Mutual
Benefits Corp., the giant viaticals company in Fort Lauderdale, was shut down
by regulators. The industry sells sick people's life-insurance policies to investors.
Viatical-settlement companies buy at a discount life insurance policies held by
the terminally ill or elderly in need of cash. In turn, they sell the policies
to investors, who collect the death benefits when the insured die. Seniors are
often heavily targeted as investors.
State
and federal regulators on Wednesday shut down Fort Lauderdale-based Mutual Benefits
Corp., saying the nation's largest viatical-settlement company committed racketeering
by luring tens of thousands of investors into an elaborate Ponzi scheme that raised
more than $1 billion. The company faces criminal charges and a civil action. In
essence, regulators say, the company promised investors that the policyholders
would die within three years -- and was wrong nine out of 10 times.
By
manipulating life expectancies, Mutual Benefits flooded the viaticals market with
policies. The company thus created shortfalls in their premium funds and used
new investor funds to keep up with premium payments. Hence the alleged Ponzi scheme.
"The
scope of this fraud is enormous," David Nelson, head of the Miami office
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said. "We're talking about a scheme
that involved more than 29,000 investors and raised more than $1 billion."
Investors
who have purchased viatical contracts from Mutual Benefits Corp. can find out
information on the receivership by calling 305-577-1099 and leaving their name
and number. A representative for the receiver will call back within two business
days, according to a recorded message. A website, www.mbcreceiver.com, is expected
to be in operation by Friday.
Patrick Danner Miami Hearld 050704
TOP
OF PAGE
| CLOSE WINDOW
"Middle
Rich" Donate Lower Percentage of Wealth than Other Groups
A
new study by San Francisco-based NewTithing Group has concluded that charitable
giving in the United States would have increased by an additional $41 billion
in 2001 if individuals in the upper middle class and "middle rich" had given as
much as other income classes.
The study defines the "upper middle class" as
those income tax filers with adjusted gross income (AGI) ranging from $200,000
to $1 million, and average investment assets of $1.7 million to $4.46 million.
The "middle rich" class is defined as filers with AGI of $1 million to $10 million,
and average investment assets of $8.5 million to $46 million.
By measuring
charitable donations as a proportion of investment assets, the study found that
individuals in the "upper middle class" and "middle rich" groups gave approximately
half of 1 percent of their wealth to charity. In contrast, individuals in lower
income groups (less than $200,000 annual income and $83,000 - $490,000 in investments)
gave approximately 1 percent of their wealth to charity.
Although the "upper
middle class" and "middle rich" owned in aggregate nearly twice as much in estimated
investment assets, their less affluent counterparts donated a total of 21 percent
more to charity-$3.26 billion more. Those individuals in the "super rich" category-filers
with adjusted gross income of at least $10 million and average investment assets
of $152 million-gave, on average, more than 1 percent of their wealth to charity.
In addition, the study found that by selling appreciated assets for taxable
gains while donating cash to charity, the "middle rich" and "super-rich" paid
more than half a billion dollars in avoidable capital gains taxes. Through more
tax-advantageous giving strategies, they could have kept or donated to charity
an additional $659 million.
From
AFP Wire 5/10/04
TOP
OF PAGE
| CLOSE WINDOW
NCPG
Government Relations Update - The CARE Act
The
National Committee on Planned Giving has new assurances the White House is fully
in support of the CARE Act and the IRA charitable rollover provision. At the special
invitation of President George W. Bush, NCPG was represented by Tanya Howe Johnson,
CEO, and Craig C. Wruck, Government Relations Chair, at the White House Conference
on Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Tuesday in Washington, DC. NCPG attended
the conference to support the CARE Act (S. 476) and the Charitable Giving Act
(H.R. 7), both of which contain IRA charitable rollover provisions.
NCPG's
successful drive to move the IRA rollover through Congress, which resulted in
broad bipartisan passage of legislation in both the House of Representatives and
the Senate, has been frustrated by Congress' unwillingness to convene a conference
committee to reconcile the bills. In his opening address, President Bush expressed
his frustration that key charitable legislation is "stuck on the hill," explaining
that, "It's a debate about process now instead of a debate about purpose."
The
president emphasized his continued support for legislation providing incentives
for charitable giving to, "Encourage social entrepreneurs and empower the agencies
of change in our communities." "Government cannot be replaced by charities, but
it can and should welcome charities as partners," the president said. "Community
organizations do a better job than government can alone."
Wruck
said the president's statements speak to one of the key points in favor of the
IRA charitable rollover provision. "By enacting legislation that could potentially
bring about billions of dollars in additional charitable gifts, philanthropic
entities will be less likely to rely on government dollars," Wruck said. "I think
the president agrees that it's time to reduce that burden."
Mr. Bush praised
the work of charitable organizations, saying, "Suffering and despair trouble all
Americans regardless of their political standing."
In
a private meeting, administration officials assured NCPG that the CARE Act and
IRA charitable rollover are still high priorities for the White House. Later this
week, NCPG will be represented in meetings with key legislators to discuss strategies
for moving the IRA charitable rollover forward. Johnson is looking forward to
a fruitful exchange of ideas on both sides of the Hill. "We are extremely pleased
to hear continued support for this policy, especially from the president," Johnson
said. "I'm hopeful we're just a short distance away from seeing this legislation
through for the public good, and achieving a new level of bi-partisan cooperation
in the process."
Source: http://www.ncpg.org
TOP
OF PAGE
| CLOSE WINDOW
Gift
Annuity Rates Unchanged
At its meeting on May 5, 2004 in Orlando, immediately prior to the ACGA conference,
the ACGA board approved the recommendation of the Gift Annuity Rates Committee
to continue the current gift annuity rates for another year. Unless unforeseen
circumstances should necessitate an interim adjustment, the rates that became
effective on July 1, 2003 will remain in effect at least through June 30, 2005.
(click here for current rates)
Although
the rates will not change this year, there was a change in the methodology for
calculating the assumed return on gift annuity reserves. The new methodology did
not result in a change in the return assumption this year, but it could in subsequent
years.
From Planned Giving Design Center 5/12/04
TOP
OF PAGE
| CLOSE WINDOW